One notable difference between the two distros is the desktop environment. Both are excellent options, but Manjaro is better for beginners. On the other hand, Linux Mint is a Debian or Ubuntu-based distribution that offers some pre-installed proprietary software. It is designed to be more accessible to all users and comes pre-installed with a lot of software. Unlike Mint, Manjaro is an open-source Linux distribution based on Arch Linux. This article will compare Manjaro and Linux Mint and weigh the differences in these categories. To make the right decision, you need to know which use case you’re trying to address. The two distros share some similarities, but they also have their own unique differences. Well I'm not sure but according to me graphics are causing it because a 64MB can't handle unity 3d (used in UBUNTU).Īnd I was not aware that it's up to us that what we would like to install on ARCH.If you’re considering switching to Linux on your PC, you might be wondering whether Manjaro or Linux Mint is a better choice. Arch Linux will be as fast or as slow as the software you install. You can install the desktop environment from Linux Mint (Cinnamon) which will run more slowly. You can install the window manager that is used in Puppy Linux (JWM) which will be blazingly fast. Other than that, it all depends on what applications you run. Because of that, Arch Linux will feel much faster. With Arch Linux, you only install what you want to install and you only run what you want to run. Instead, just running lots of applications is making it slow. I don't think having 64 MB of video memory is what's causing the other operating systems to be slow. Oops! According to Trilby, you can use either architecture. Your processor does not support 64 bit applications, so only Arch Linux 32 bit will work. Also please tell me which version of Arch linx will run better (32 BITS) If my Pc can then you can give link to dual boot it. Because mostly all the linux I have tried (Ubuntu/Fedora/Mint) was slow due to video memory. Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4CPU 2.8GhzĬan I use Arch Linux (Dual boot with windows XP) on it? Will it gonna cause any problem due to 64 MB video memory. HDD: 160GB (80GB taken by windows XP, rest will be used by Linux) Suddenly (now) Arch linux came into my mind, I searched on the forum to know that it can run on my old system or not and founded many people are using it on their old systems. Then (yesterday) I downloaded puppy linux. I knew that it was so slow during installation, it will remain like that. I tried my best to boot into Ubuntu but failed :3. Mouse was running smooth but due to unity (Ubuntu uses) it was very slow and unfortunately something happened to my bootloader (maybe I did something wrong). Some days ago, I downloaded Ubuntu (The latest version) and It was damn slow during installation. In between I also downloaded Kali Linux (Penetration Testing OS), but didn't installed it. It was good, runs fine but some time it becomes laggy (specially when surfing on the internet etc).Īfter It, I tried to use Fedora. I tried to test on my old PC (Pentium 4, specs given below) because I wanted to dual boot with windows xp and any linux. I have been using windows from start but some months ago (may be 5-6), I started taking interest in Linux.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |